Appeals court says President Trump can mobilize California National Guard

20.06.2025    The Mercury News    10 views
Appeals court says President Trump can mobilize California National Guard

President Donald Trump can mobilize the California National Guard to protect federal personnel and property while enforcing immigration laws in Los Angeles a federal appeals court ruled Thursday in a setback for Gov Gavin Newsom who has opposed using the troops in response to protests that rocked the city last week Newsom had sued to block the Trump administration from calling in the National Guard demanding they return control of the California National Guard to Governor Newsom A federal trial court June upheld a temporary restraining order sought by the governor But after hearing arguments Tuesday a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit U S Court of Appeals granted the Trump administration an emergency order for a stay of that lower court ruling on grounds that they made the required strong showing that they are likely to succeed on the merits of their appeal The appellate judges noted that they disagreed with the Trump administration s argument earlier this week that the President s decision to federalize members of the California National Guard is entirely insulated from judicial review Nonetheless the appellate panel continued we are persuaded that under longstanding precedent it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority which authorizes federalization of the National Guard when the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States ' California Attorney General Rob Bonta in a message Thursday evening revealed that while it is disappointing that our temporary restraining order has been stayed pending the federal ruling body s appeal this affair is far from over The Trump Administration far overreached its authority with its unprecedented and unlawful federalization of the California National Guard and deployment of military troops into our communities Bonta declared While the court did not provide immediate relief for Angelenos in the current era we remain confident in our arguments and will continue the fight Newsom revealed Thursday that the court rightly rejected Trump s claim that he can do whatever he wants with the National Guard and not have to explain himself to a court The President is not a king and is not above the law Newsom stated We will press forward with our challenge to President Trump s authoritarian use of U S military soldiers against citizens Trump called the appellate ruling a BIG WIN on his social media This is a Great Decision for our Country and we will continue to protect and defend Law abiding Americans Trump posted Bonta noted that the appellate court in granting the federal authorities s motion stayed the district court s temporary restraining order barring Trump from mobilizing the California National Guard during the federal governing body s appeal The attorney general and governor did not indicate in their statements Thursday whether they would pursue other legal approaches before the appeal is heard In granting the Trump administration s a stay of the lower court ruling the appellate panel noted that Congress authorized the President of the United States to call into Federal amenity members and units of the National Guard of any State whenever one or more of three conditions are satisfied Those conditions the court ruled are whenever is invaded or is in danger of invasion by a foreign nation or there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Governing body of the United States or the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States Citing earlier court rulings the panel mentioned that the power confided to the President is a limited power that can be exercised only in the cases pointed out in the statute The panel uncovered that Trump would likely prevail on the administration s claim that the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States rejecting the lower court argument that the statute does not allow for the federalizing of the National Guard when the President faces obstacles that cause him to underperform in executing the laws The panel responded that the statute cannot plausibly be read to mean that so long as any quantum of federal law enforcement could be accomplished in the face of mob violence the President would be unable to call up the Guard to respond The panel also rejected Newsom s argument that Trump was obligated to issue his federalization orders for the California National Guard through the governor writing that Trump s Secretary of Defense s transmittal of the order to the Adjutant General of the California National Guard who is authorized under California law to issue all orders in the name of the Governor should suffice The exigency appeal was heard and decided by judges Mark J Bennett Eric D Miller and Jennifer Sung Bennett and Miller were appointed by Trump and Sung by former President Joe Biden The trial court incident was decided by U S District Judge Charles R Breyer appointed by former President Bill Clinton

Similar News

A wrongful-death lawsuit and the growing movement against ‘ecocide’
A wrongful-death lawsuit and the growing movement against ‘ecocide’

Julie Leon, age 65, died in Seattle on June 28, 2021. The cause of death? Hyperthermia, a body tempe...

20.06.2025 1
Read More
Walters: California schools need leaders’ attention more than money
Walters: California schools need leaders’ attention more than money

Historically, the annual process of writing a state budget has often stumbled over how much money Ca...

20.06.2025 1
Read More
Miss Manners: Can I weigh in on a woman’s clownish
Miss Manners: Can I weigh in on a woman’s clownish makeup?

DEAR MISS MANNERS: I’ve noticed that some mature women do not change how they apply makeup as they g...

20.06.2025 7
Read More